Knitting patterns of biodiversity, range size and body size in aquatic beetle faunas: significant relationships but slightly divergent drivers
Corresponding Author
Jani Heino
Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity Centre, Oulu, Finland
Correspondence: Jani Heino, Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, Paavo Havaksen Tie 3, FI-90570, Oulu, Finland. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJanne Alahuhta
Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jani Heino
Finnish Environment Institute, Biodiversity Centre, Oulu, Finland
Correspondence: Jani Heino, Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, Paavo Havaksen Tie 3, FI-90570, Oulu, Finland. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJanne Alahuhta
Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
1. Ecogeographical rules refer to recurring patterns in nature, including the latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG), Rapoport's rule and Bergmann's rule, amongst others. In the present study, the existence of these rules was examined for diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae), a family of aquatic predatory beetles.
2. Assemblage-level data were analysed for diving beetles, focusing on species richness, local contribution to beta diversity (LCBD), mean range size and mean body size across the biogeographical provinces of Northern Europe. First, each of these variables was correlated with latitude, and then variation in each variable was modelled using actual environmental variables in boosted regression tree analysis.
3. Species richness was found to decrease with latitude, LCBD increased with latitude, mean range size did not show a significant relationship with latitude, and mean body size decreased with latitude. The latter finding was in contrast to Bergmann's rule. The actual environmental variables best predicting variation in these four response variables varied among the models, although they generally included temperature-related and land use variables as the most influential ones.
4. The results obtained in the present study suggest that diving beetles conformed to the LDG, did not follow Rapoport's rule, and showed a reversed latitudinal gradient in the context of Bergmann's rule. In addition, species-poor provinces harboured ecologically most unique faunas, suggesting that species richness and LCBD are complementary measures of biodiversity.
5. Even though general support was not found for most of the ecogeographical rules examined, the findings of the present study are interesting because they suggest that aquatic ectothermic invertebrates may show patterns different from those originally described for terrestrial endothermic vertebrates.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
een12717-sup-0001-FigureS1.docxWord 2007 document , 38.5 KB | Fig. S1. Species-based histograms of range size (a) and body size (b) for diving beetles in Northern Europe. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Anderson, M.J., Crist, T.O., Chase, J.M., Vellend, M., Inouye, B.D., Freestone, A.L. et al. (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters, 14, 19–28.
- Ashton, K.G., Tracy, M.C. & de Queiroz, A. (2000) Is Bergmann's rule valid for mammals? American Naturalist, 156, 390–415.
- Bergmann, C. (1847) Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttinger Studien, 3, 595–708.
- Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J. & Loder, N. (1999) Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann's rule. Diversity and Distributions, 5, 165–174.
10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00046.x Google Scholar
- Brown, J.H. (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
- Brown, J.H. & Lomolino, M.V. (1998) Biogeography. Second Edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, U.K.
- Calosi, P., Bilton, D.T., Spicer, J.I., Votier, S.C. & Atfield, A. (2010) What determines a species' geographical range? Thermal biology and latitudinal range size relationships in European diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Journal of Animal Ecology, 79, 194–204.
- Clauss, M., Dittmann, M.T., Müller, D.W., Meloro, C. & Codron, D. (2013) Bergmann's rule in mammals: a cross-species interspecific pattern. Oikos, 122, 1465–1472.
- Currie, D.J., Mittelbach, G.G., Cornell, H.V., Kaufman, D.M., Kerr, J.T. & Oberdorff, T. (2004) Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecology Letters, 7, 1121–1134.
- Cushman, J.H., Lawton, J.H. & Manly, B.J.F. (1993) Latitudinal patterns in European ant assemblages: variation in species richness and body size. Oecologia, 95, 30–37.
- Dehling, D.M., Hof, C., Brändle, M. & Brandl, R. (2010) Habitat availability does not explain the species richness patterns of European lentic and lotic freshwater animals. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 1919–1926.
- G. H. Denton & T. J. Hughes (eds) (1981) The Last Great Ice Sheets. Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York.
- Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R. & Hastie, T. (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 802–813.
- García-Vázquez, D., Bilton, D.T., Foster, G.N. & Ribera, I. (2017) Pleistocene range shifts, refugia and the origin of widespread species in Western Palaearctic water beetles. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 114, 122–136.
- Gaston, K.J. (2003) The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
- Gaston, K.J. & Blackburn, T.M. (2000) Pattern and Process in Macroecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
10.1002/9780470999592 Google Scholar
- Gaston, K.J. & Chown, S.L. (1999) Why Rapoport's rule does not generalise. Oikos, 84, 309–312.
- Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. & Spicer, J.I. (1998) Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 70–74.
- Gaston, K.J., Chown, S.L. & Evans, K.L. (2008) Ecogeographical rules: elements of a synthesis. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 483–500.
- Geist, V. (1987) Bergmann's rule is invalid. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65, 1035–1038.
- Gérard, M., Vanderplanck, M., Franzen, M., Kuhlmann, M., Potts, S.G., Rasmont, P. et al. (2018) Patterns of size variation in bees at a continental scale: does Bergmann's rule apply? Oikos, 127, 1095–1103.
- Gómez-Rodríguez, C. & Baselga, A. (2018) Variation among European beetle taxa in patterns of distance decay of similarity suggests a major role of dispersal processes. Ecography, 41, 1825–1834.
- Heino, J. (2011) A macroecological perspective of diversity patterns in the freshwater realm. Freshwater Biology, 56, 1703–1722.
- Heino, J. & Alahuhta, J. (2015) Elements of regional beetle faunas: faunal variation and compositional breakpoints along climate, land cover and geographical gradients. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84, 427–441.
- Heino, J. & Grönroos, M. (2017) Exploring species and site contributions to beta diversity in stream insect assemblages. Oecologia, 183, 151–160.
- Heino, J., Alahuhta, J. & Fattorini, S. (2015) Phylogenetic diversity of regional beetle faunas at high latitudes: patterns, drivers and chance along ecological gradients. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 2751–2767.
- Heino, J., Bini, L.M., Andersson, J., Bergsten, J., Bjelke, U. & Johansson, H. (2017) Unravelling the correlates of species richness and ecological uniqueness in a metacommunity of urban pond insects. Ecological Indicators, 73, 422–431.
- Hewitt, G.M. (1999) Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 87–112.
- Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G. & Jarvis, A. (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965–1978.
- Hijmans, R.J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. (2016) Dismo: species distribution modeling. R package Version 1.1-1. [WWW document]. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/dismo/index.html [accessed on 3 January 2017].
- Hillebrand, H. (2004) On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. American Naturalist, 163, 192–211.
- Hof, A.R., Jansson, R. & Nilsson, C. (2012) The usefulness of elevation as a predictor variable in species distribution modelling. Ecological Modelling, 246, 86–90.
- Hortal, J., Diniz-Filho, J.A., Bini, L.M., Rodríguez, M.Á., Baselga, A., Nogués-Bravo, D. et al. (2011) Ice age climate, evolutionary constraints and diversity patterns of European dung beetles. Ecology Letters, 14, 741–748.
- Houmark-Nielsen, M., Linge, H., Fabel, D., Schnabel, C., Xu, S., Wilcken, K.M. et al. (2012) Cosmogenic surface exposure dating the last deglaciation in Denmark: discrepancies with independent age constraints suggest delayed periglacial landform stabilisation. Quaternary Geochronology, 13, 1–17.
- Hurlbert, A.H. & Stegen, J.C. (2014) On the processes generating latitudinal richness gradients: identifying diagnostic patterns and predictions. Frontiers in Genetics, 5, 420.
- Kinlock, N.L., Prowant, L., Herstoff, E.M., Foley, C.M., Akin-Fajiye, M., Bender, N. et al. (2018) Explaining global variation in the latitudinal diversity gradient: meta-analysis confirms known patterns and uncovers new ones. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27, 125–141.
- Kleman, J. & Hättestrand, C. (1999) Frozen-bed Fennoscandian and Laurentide ice sheets during the last glacial maximum. Nature, 402, 63–66.
- Koleff, P., Gaston, K.J. & Lennon, J.J. (2003) Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 367–382.
- Kouki, J., Niemelä, P. & Viitasaari, M. (1994) Reversed latitudinal gradients in species richness of sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 31, 83–88.
- Landeiro, V.L., Franz, B., Heino, J., Siqueira, T. & Bini, L.M. (2018) Species poor and low-lying sites are more ecologically unique in a hyperdiverse Amazon region: evidence from multiple taxonomic groups. Diversity and Distributions, 24, 966–977.
- Lawton, J.H. (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 84, 177–192.
- Legendre, P. & Gallagher, E.D. (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129, 271–280.
- Legendre, P. & De Cáceres, M. (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecology Letters, 16, 951–963.
- Meiri, S. & Dayan, T. (2003) On the validity of Bergmann's rule. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 331–351.
- Morinière, J., Van Dam, M.H., Hawlitschek, O., Bergsten, J., Michat, M.C., Hendrich, L. et al. (2016) Phylogenetic niche conservatism explains an inverse latitudinal diversity gradient in freshwater arthropods. Scientific Reports, 6, 26340.
- Nilsson, A.N. & Holmen, M. (1995) The Aquatic Adephaga of Fennoscandia and Denmark 2. Dytiscidae. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, 32, 1–188.
- Nilsson, A.N. & Söderberg, H. (1996) Abundance and species richness patterns of diving beetles (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) from exposed and protected sites in 98 northern Swedish lakes. Hydrobiologia, 321, 83–88.
- Nilsson, A.N., Elmberg, J. & Sjöberg, K. (1994) Abundance and species richness patterns of predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) in Swedish lakes. Journal of Biogeography, 21, 197–206.
- Olalla-Tárraga, M.Á., Rodríguez, M.Á. & Hawkins, B.A. (2006) Broad-scale patterns of body size in squamate reptiles of Europe and North America. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 781–793.
- Pearson, R.G. & Boyero, L. (2009) Gradients in regional diversity of freshwater taxa. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 28, 504–514.
- Pielou, E.C. (1991) After the Ice Age: The Return of Life to Glaciated North America. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
10.7208/chicago/9780226668093.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Pintor, A.F., Schwarzkopf, L. & Krockenberger, A.K. (2015) Rapoport's rule: do climatic variability gradients shape range extent? Ecological Monographs, 85, 643–659.
- Rodríguez, M.Á., Olalla-Tárraga, M.Á. & Hawkins, B.A. (2008) Bergmann's rule and the geography of mammal body size in the Western Hemisphere. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, 274–283.
- Rohde, K. (1992) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514–527.
- Rohde, K. (1996) Rapoport's rule is a local phenomenon and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Biodiversity Letters, 3, 10–13.
- Rohde, K., Heap, M. & Heap, D. (1993) Rapoport's rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. American Naturalist, 142, 1–16.
- Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995) Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
- Rosenzweig, M.L. (2003) How to reject the area hypothesis of latitudinal gradients. Macroecology: Concepts and Consequences (ed. by T. M. Blackburn and K. J. Gaston), pp. 87–106. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K.
- da Silva, P.G., Hernández, M.I.M. & Heino, J. (2018) Disentangling the correlates of species and site contributions to beta diversity in dung beetle assemblages. Diversity and Distributions, 24, 1674–1686.
- Šizling, A.L., Storch, D. & Keil, P. (2009) Rapoport's rule, species tolerances, and the latitudinal diversity gradient: geometric considerations. Ecology, 90, 3575–3586.
- Soininen, J. (2012) Macroecology of unicellular organisms – patterns and processes. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 4, 10–22.
- Stevens, G.C. (1989) The latitudinal gradients in geographical range: how so many species co-exist in the tropics. American Naturalist, 133, 240–256.
- Stevens, G.C. (1996) Extending Rapoport's rule to Pacific marine fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 149–154.
- Tomašových, A., Jablonski, D., Berke, S.K., Krug, Z.A. & Valentine, J.W. (2015) Nonlinear thermal gradients shape broad-scale patterns in geographic range size and can reverse Rapoport's rule. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24, 257–267.
- Tomašových, A., Kennedy, J.D., Betzner, T.J., Bitler Kuehnle, N., Edie, S., Kim, S. et al. (2016) Unifying latitudinal gradients in range size and richness across marine and terrestrial systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 283, 20153027.
- Tonkin, J.D., Heino, J., Sundermann, A., Haase, P. & Jähnig, S. (2016) Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of central German stream metacommunities. Freshwater Biology, 61, 607–620.
- Vad, C.F., Péntek, A.L., Cozma, N.J., Földi, A., Tóth, A., Tóth, B. et al. (2017) Wartime scars or reservoirs of biodiversity? The value of bomb crater ponds in aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation, 209, 253–262.
- Väisänen, R. & Heliövaara, K. (1994) Hot-spots of insect diversity in northern Europe. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 31, 71–81.
- Väisänen, R., Heliövaara, K. & Immonen, A. (1992) Biogeography of northern European insects: province records in multivariate analysis (Saltatoria, Lepidoptera: Sesiidae; Coleoptera: Bubrestidae, Cerambycidae). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 28, 57–81.
- Vamosi, S.M., Naydani, C.J. & Vamosi, J.C. (2007) Body size and species richness along geographical gradients in Albertan diving beetle (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85, 443–449.
- Vannote, R.L. & Sweeney, B.W. (1980) Geographic analysis of thermal equilibria: a conceptual model for evaluating the effect of natural and modified thermal regimes on aquatic insect communities. American Naturalist, 115, 667–695.
- Vilmi, A., Karjalainen, S.M. & Heino, J. (2017) Ecological uniqueness of stream and lake diatom communities shows different macroecological patterns. Diversity and Distributions, 23, 1042–1053.
- Welzel, R.W. (2001) Limnology. Lake and River Ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
- Willig, M.R., Kaufman, D.M. & Stevens, R.D. (2003) Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34, 273–309.