Attractiveness of wildflower mixtures for wild bees and hoverflies depends on some key plant species
Corresponding Author
Daniela Warzecha
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Correspondence: Daniela Warzecha, Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorTim Diekötter
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorVolkmar Wolters
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorFrank Jauker
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Daniela Warzecha
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Correspondence: Daniela Warzecha, Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorTim Diekötter
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorVolkmar Wolters
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorFrank Jauker
Department of Animal Ecology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
- Agricultural intensification is considered to be a major driver of terrestrial biodiversity decline. Resulting loss, isolation and degradation of flower-rich habitats are threatening pollinators. Agri-environmental schemes (AES) aim to counteract these negative effects, including measures to enhance floral resources in agricultural landscapes. The impact of plant species composition on their efficiency to mitigate pollinator loss, however, is largely unexplored.
- We tested four recommended seed mixtures for their attractiveness to wild bees and hoverflies in a replicated plot design over two consecutive years against the background of the seedbank. Of the 94 available plant species, 14 key plant species were crucial for the whole flower-visiting bee and hoverfly community. Approximately one third of each originated from the seedbank. The four top plants already supported 80% of flower visitors. Although seed mixtures differed significantly in attracting flower visitors at the plot level, the presence of key plants was more important than plant species diversity per se.
- Seed mixtures showed contrasting attractiveness for wild bees and hoverflies. Identification of plant species exclusively utilised by specific taxonomic groups opens opportunities for assorting plant mixtures for specific ecosystem functions or taxa of conservation concern. Plant species shared by common pollinators are valuable for overall pollinator diversity.
- The fact that rare and specialised pollinator species were mostly absent, however, substantiates that within 2 years of establishment, flowering resources are not the sole limiting factor in modern agricultural landscapes. Considering additional resources seems indispensable to maximise the conservation of species-rich pollinator communities.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
icad12264-sup-0001-AppendixS1-S5.pdfPDF document, 883.2 KB |
Appendix S1. Wildflower mixtures used to for the random block design in this study. Shown is the share of seeds [%] per wildflower mixture. Composition of the plant species is based on the producer formula from 2012. Recent mixtures may be subtly different to the used ones. Plant species are arranged by their occurrence across seed mixtures visualised by grey filling. Appendix S2. Specimen sampled by slowly walking the sides of the 28 wildflower plots during flower visitor surveys. A detailed data set including visited plant species is available from the authors upon request. Appendix S3. Blooming periods of relevant plant species. Listed are all recorded plant species from the experimental site as well as plants from the mixtures that have not grown up. Information is taken from Jäger and Werner (2005). Longevity is given as: a = annual, b = biennial and p = perennial. Appendix S4. Beta diversity of four different seed mixtures. Beta diversity was pairwise calculated for 24 sites as a dissimilarity matrix with the function betadiver in R. Each boxplot represents the comparison of dissimilarity data for one mixture (A) L1; (B) O1; (C) O2 and (D) VH. The first three boxes per boxplot show the dissimilarity of the beta diversity values of the given mixture compared to any other mixtures and the last box compared within itself. The box represents the lower and upper quartiles, the solid line, the median and the circle, the minimum or maximum observation. L1 = Lebensraum 1; VH = Veitshöchheimer Bienenweide; O2 = Odin 2; O1 = Odin 1. Appendix S5. Graph of the total plant–pollinator network. Black rectangles represent plant (below) and flower-visiting insect (above) species. Rectangle width is proportional to the number of interactions recorded per species. Lines represent links between species; line width is proportional to the frequency of interactions (number of visits recorded by a visitor species to a plant species). |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J.M. (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science, 312, 431–433.
- Batáry, P., Dicks, L.V., Kleijn, D. & Sutherland, W.J. (2015) The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 29, 1006–1016.
- Biesmeijer, J.C., Roberts, S.P.M., Reemer, M., Ohlemüller, R., Edwards, M., Peeters, T., Schaffers, A.P., Potts, S.G., Kleukers, R., Thomas, C.D., Settele, J. & Kunin, W.E. (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science, 313, 351–354.
- Bommarco, R., Biesmeijer, J.C., Meyer, B., Potts, S.G., Pöyry, J., Roberts, S.P.M., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Öckinger, E. (2010) Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2075–2082.
- Bruckman, D. & Campbell, D.R. (2014) Floral neighborhood influences pollinator assemblages and effective pollination in a native plant. Oecologia, 176, 465–476.
- Burkle, L.A., Marlin, J.C. & Knight, T.M. (2013) Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science, 339, 1611–1615.
- Carvell, C., Meek, W.R., Pywell, R.F., Goulson, D. & Nowakowski, M. (2007) Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 29–40.
- Carvell, C., Osborne, J.L., Bourke, A.F.G., Freeman, N., Pywell, R.F. & Heard, M.S. (2011) Bumble bee species’ responses to a targeted conservation measure depend on landscape context and habitat quality. Ecological Applications, 21, 1760–1771.
- Carvell, C., Roy, D.B., Smart, S.M., Pywell, R.F., Preston, C.D. & Goulson, D. (2006) Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale. Biological Conservation, 132, 481–489.
- Dahms, H., Mayr, S., Birkhofer, K., Chauvat, M., Melnichnova, E., Wolters, V. & Dauber, J. (2010) Contrasting diversity patterns of epigeic arthropods between grasslands of high and low agronomic potential. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 6–14.
- Di Giulio, M., Edwards, P.J. & Meister, E. (2001) Enhancing insect diversity in agricultural grasslands: the roles of management and landscape structure. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 310–319.
- Diekötter, T., Kadoya, T., Peter, F., Wolters, V. & Jauker, F. (2010) Oilseed rape crops distort plant–pollinator interactions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 209–214.
- Diekötter, T., Peter, F., Jauker, B., Wolters, V. & Jauker, F. (2014) Mass-flowering crops increase richness of cavity-nesting bees and wasps in modern agro-ecosystems. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 6, 219–226.
- Dormann, C.F. (2011) How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks. Network Biology, 1, 1–20.
- Dramstad, W. & Fry, G. (1995) Foraging activity of bumblebees (Bombus) in relation to flower resources on arable land. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 53, 123–135.
- Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N.D., O'Connell, C., Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D. & Zaks, D.P.M. (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342.
- Gibson, R.H., Nelson, I.L., Hopkins, G.W., Hamlett, B.J. & Memmott, J. (2006) Pollinator webs, plant communities and the conservation of rare plants: arable weeds as a case study. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 246–257.
- Goulson, D., Hanley, M.E., Darvill, B., Ellis, J.S. & Knight, M.E. (2005) Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biological Conservation, 122, 1–8.
- Grass, I., Albrecht, J., Jauker, F., Diekötter, T., Warzecha, D., Wolters, V. & Farwig, N. (2016) Much more than bees - Wildflower plantings support highly diverse flower-visitor communities from complex to structurally simple agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 225, 45–53.
- Hannon, L.E. & Sisk, T.D. (2009) Hedgerows in an agri-natural landscape: potential habitat value for native bees. Biological Conservation, 142, 2140–2154.
- Hegland, S.J. & Boeke, L. (2006) Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resources and flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community. Ecological Entomology, 31, 532–538.
- Jäger, E. J. & Werner, K. (2005) Rothmaler, Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, Bd. 4, Gefäßpflanzen, Kritischer Band 10. Aufl. Elsevier, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, München, Germany.
- Jauker, F., Diekötter, T., Schwarzbach, F. & Wolters, V. (2009) Pollinator dispersal in an agricultural matrix: opposing responses of wild bees and hoverflies to landscape structure and distance from main habitat. Landscape Ecology, 24, 547–555.
- Kleijn, D., Baquero, R.A., Clough, Y., Díaz, M., De Esteban, J., Fernández, F., Gabriel, D., Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Jöhl, R., Knop, E., Kruess, A., Marshall, E.J.P., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., Verhulst, J., West, T.M. & Yela, J.L. (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters, 9, 243–254.
- Kleijn, D., Winfree, R., Bartomeus, I., Carvalheiro, L.G., Henry, M., Isaacs, R., Klein, A.-M., Kremen, C., M'Gonigle, L.K., Rader, R., Ricketts, T.H., Williams, N.M., Adamson, N.L., Ascher, J.S., Baldi, A., Batary, P., Benjamin, F., Biesmeijer, J.C., Blitzer, E.J., Bommarco, R., Brand, M.R., Bretagnolle, V., Button, L., Cariveau, D.P., Chifflet, R., Colville, J.F., Danforth, B.N., Elle, E., Garratt, M.P.D., Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Howlett, B.G., Jauker, F., Jha, S., Knop, E., Krewenka, K.M., Le Feon, V., Mandelik, Y., May, E.A., Park, M.G., Pisanty, G., Reemer, M., Riedinger, V., Rollin, O., Rundlof, M., Sardinas, H.S., Scheper, J., Sciligo, A.R., Smith, H.G., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thorp, R., Tscharntke, T., Verhulst, J., Viana, B.F., Vaissiere, B.E., Veldtman, R., Westphal, C. & Potts, S.G. (2015) Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nature Communications, 6, 7414.
- Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B.E., Cane, J.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C. & Tscharntke, T. (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 303–313.
- Korpela, E.-L., Hyvönen, T., Lindgren, S. & Kuussaari, M. (2013) Can pollination services, species diversity and conservation be simultaneously promoted by sown wildflower strips on farmland? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 179, 18–24.
- Lázaro, A., Lundgren, R. & Totland, Ø. (2009) Co-flowering neighbors influence the diversity and identity of pollinator groups visiting plant species. Oikos, 118, 691–702.
- Marshall, E.J.P., Brown, V.K., Boatman, N.D., Lutman, P.J.W., Squire, G.R. & Ward, L.K. (2003) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Research, 43, 77–89.
- Marshall, E.J.R. & Moonen, A.C. (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 89, 5–21.
- Memmott, J., Carvell, C., Pywell, R.F. & Craze, P.G. (2010) The potential impact of global warming on the efficacy of field margins sown for the conservation of bumblebees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2071–2079.
- M'Gonigle, L.K., Williams, N.M., Lonsdorf, E. & Kremen, C. (2016) A tool for selecting plants when restoring habitat for pollinators. Conservation Letters, 10, 105–111.
- Öckinger, E. & Smith, H.G. (2007) Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 50–59.
- Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O'Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H. & Wagner, H. (2015) vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version, 2, 3–1.
- Ovenden, G.N., Swash, A.R.H. & Smallshire, D. (1998) Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 955–960.
- Potts, S.G., Biesmeijer, J.C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O. & Kunin, W.E. (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 345–353.
- Potts, S.G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne'eman, G. & Willmer, P. (2003) Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities?. Ecology, 84, 2628–2642.
- R Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Core Team, Vienna, Austria. <http://www.r-project.org/> 6th March 2014.
- Ramseier, H., Füglistaller, D., Lädrach, C., Ramseier, C., Rauch, M. & Widmer Etter, F. (2016) Blühstreifen fördern Honig- und Wildbienen. Agrarforschung Schweiz, 6, 276–283.
- Robinson, R.A. & Sutherland, W.J. (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 157–176.
- Scheper, J., Bommarco, R., Holzschuh, A., Potts, S.G., Riedinger, V., Roberts, S.P.M., Rundlöf, M., Smith, H.G., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Wickens, J.B., Wickens, V.J. & Kleijn, D. (2015) Local and landscape-level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 1165–1175.
- Scheper, J., Holzschuh, A., Kuussaari, M., Potts, S.G., Rundlöf, M., Smith, H.G. & Kleijn, D. (2013) Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss—a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 16, 912–920.
- Scheper, J., Reemer, M., van Kats, R., Ozinga, W.A., van der Linden, G.T., Schaminee, J.H., Siepel, H. & Kleijn, D. (2014) Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 17552–17557.
- Schmid-Egger, C. & Witt, R. (2014) Ackerblühstreifen für Wildbienen – Was bringen sie wirklich? Ampulex, 6, 13–22.
- Tschumi, M., Albrecht, M., Collatz, J., Dubsky, V., Entling, M.H., Najar-Rodriguez, A.J. & Jacot, K. (2016) Tailored flower strips promote natural enemy biodiversity and pest control in potato crops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53, 1169–1176.
- Warzecha, D., Diekötter, T., Wolters, V. & Jauker, F. (2016) Intraspecific body size increases with habitat fragmentation in wild bee pollinators. Landscape Ecology, 31, 1449–1455.
- Westrich, P. (1989) Die Wildbienen Baden-Württembergs I, Allgemeiner Teil. Die Nahrungspflanzen der Wildbienen, pp. 300–391. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.
- Winfree, R. (2010) The conservation and restoration of wild bees. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1195, 169–197.